The President cannot acquire territory alone. Territorial acquisition requires: (1) a treaty ratified by 2/3 of the Senate (67 votes if all present), (2) House appropriations for any purchase price, and (3) implementing legislation for territorial governance. Executive agreements cannot substitute for treaties when acquiring sovereign territory. Historical precedents like Alaska and Louisiana followed this process - there's no shortcut.
Congressional Pathway: Step by Step
Click each step to see detailed requirements:
The President has authority to negotiate treaties, but cannot bind the United States without Senate consent.
- State Department conducts negotiations
- Terms must be acceptable to both parties
- Purchase price, status, and transition terms agreed
- Treaty text finalized for submission to Senate
Article II, Section 2: The President "shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur."
- 67 votes if all 100 Senators present
- Senate Foreign Relations Committee holds hearings
- Floor debate and potential amendments
- This is the highest threshold in the Constitution
Why so hard? Treaties bind the nation permanently. The Framers wanted substantial consensus before such commitments.
Article I, Section 9: "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law."
- All spending bills must originate in the House
- Appropriations Committee controls process
- Purchase price could range from billions to hundreds of billions
- Must also fund transition costs and ongoing administration
Political reality: House members face voters every 2 years. Spending vast sums on foreign territory is a hard vote.
The Constitution gives Congress power over territories (Article IV, Section 3). This requires legislation addressing:
- Territorial status: incorporated vs. unincorporated
- Citizenship status of residents
- Which federal laws apply
- Local government structure
- Tax status and federal benefits
- Path to statehood (if any)
After Congressional action is complete:
- President signs appropriations and governance legislation
- Treaty enters into force
- Transition period begins
- Territory formally transferred to US sovereignty
Total process: Even with political will, this would take 1-2+ years minimum.
The Treaty Clause: Article II, Section 2
The US Constitution gives the President power to make treaties, but only "by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate... provided two thirds of the Senators present concur."
Requirements Checklist
Toggle each requirement to explore the details:
Realistic Timeline
As of January 2026, the Senate composition makes achieving 67 votes on any controversial measure extremely difficult. A Greenland acquisition treaty would require significant bipartisan support, as no party holds close to a supermajority.
Can the President Use an Executive Agreement?
Presidents have increasingly used executive agreements rather than treaties to make international commitments, avoiding the 2/3 Senate requirement. Could this work for Greenland?
Executive agreements cannot be used to acquire sovereign territory. The constitutional structure requires Senate treaty ratification for permanent territorial acquisition, and no historical precedent supports using executive agreements for this purpose.
1. Constitutional Text
The Treaty Clause specifically contemplates Senate involvement in major international commitments. Territorial acquisition is exactly the type of consequential action the Framers intended to require supermajority consent.
2. Historical Practice
Every major territorial acquisition has gone through the treaty process:
- Louisiana Purchase (1803) - Treaty with France
- Florida (1819) - Treaty with Spain
- Alaska (1867) - Treaty with Russia
- US Virgin Islands (1917) - Treaty with Denmark
3. Congressional-Executive Agreements
Some argue that "Congressional-executive agreements" (approved by simple majorities in both chambers) can substitute for treaties. However this still requires Congressional approval and has no precedent for territorial acquisition.
4. Sole Executive Agreements
Agreements made by the President alone are limited to matters within the President's independent constitutional authority. Acquiring foreign territory is not within that authority.
Historical Precedents
Click each to see how prior territorial acquisitions worked:
The closest precedent to a potential Greenland acquisition. Secretary of State William Seward negotiated the purchase from Russia, facing significant domestic opposition ("Seward's Folly"). The treaty required:
- Senate ratification by 2/3 majority (passed 37-2 after political maneuvering)
- House appropriations for the $7.2 million purchase price (delayed, passed 113-43)
- Implementing legislation for territorial governance
Key difference from Greenland: Russia was willing to sell, and there was no population with self-determination rights to consider (only ~30,000 indigenous residents, whose consent was not sought).
President Jefferson's acquisition of the Louisiana Territory from France doubled the size of the United States. Despite Jefferson's own constitutional doubts about presidential authority to acquire territory, the purchase proceeded via:
- Treaty with France (ratified by Senate 24-7)
- Congressional appropriations for the $15 million purchase
- Organizing legislation for territorial governance
Key difference: France was eager to sell (needed funds for European wars), and the territory was largely unpopulated (from European perspective).
The most recent example of the US acquiring territory from Denmark. The Danish West Indies were purchased during World War I to prevent potential German acquisition. Process:
- Treaty with Denmark (ratified by Senate)
- Congressional appropriations for $25 million purchase
- Danish referendum in the islands approved the transfer
Key lesson: Even in 1917, democratic consent of the territorial population was considered important enough to conduct a referendum.
Other Territorial Acquisitions
- Florida (1819): Treaty with Spain (Adams-Onis Treaty), Senate ratification
- Gadsden Purchase (1853): Treaty with Mexico, Senate ratification, House appropriations
- Puerto Rico, Guam, Philippines (1898): Treaty of Paris ending Spanish-American War, Senate ratification
In every case of peaceful territorial acquisition, the treaty-appropriations process was followed. There is no precedent for presidential acquisition of territory without Congressional involvement.
- 67 Senate votes required - Treaty Clause demands 2/3 supermajority for territorial acquisition
- House controls the money - No purchase possible without appropriations
- Executive agreements won't work - No precedent for using anything other than treaties for territorial acquisition
- Territorial status requires legislation - Congress must establish governance framework
- Historical precedent is clear - Alaska, Louisiana, Virgin Islands all followed Senate-House process
- Political feasibility is low - Current Senate composition makes 67 votes extremely difficult for controversial measures
Interactive consent matrix, pathway selector, and coercion stress test. The complete analysis.
Every actor who gets a veto: Denmark, Greenland voters, US Senate, NATO. Full legal citations.
How each pathway actually works: basing, cession, independence-first. What breaks each one.
Why "military option on the table" triggers international law alarms. Article 2(4) explained.
When the US pressures a NATO ally over territory, the alliance architecture breaks. Here's how.
Can Trump just buy it? Did we already try? What about Alaska? Your questions answered.