⚠ Critical: Notify EPLI Carrier Immediately
Employment Practices Liability Insurance (EPLI) covers harassment and discrimination claims. Notify your carrier immediately upon receiving any complaint, demand letter, or CRD/EEOC charge. Most policies require prompt notice and provide legal defense. Do NOT investigate or respond without consulting with counsel or your carrier.
Types of Claims Under FEHA
Sexual Harassment
Quid pro quo or hostile work environment based on sex, gender, or sexual orientation
Race/National Origin Discrimination
Adverse actions or harassment based on race, color, ancestry, or national origin
Disability Discrimination
Failure to accommodate, adverse action based on disability, or disability harassment
Age Discrimination
Adverse treatment of employees 40+ years old (FEHA has no upper limit unlike federal ADEA)
Religious Discrimination
Failure to accommodate religious practices or discrimination based on religion
Pregnancy Discrimination
Adverse actions related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions
Retaliation
Adverse action for complaining about discrimination, participating in investigation, or opposing unlawful practices
CFRA/FMLA Interference
Denial of leave, retaliation for taking leave, or failure to reinstate
Understanding FEHA Coverage
⚖ FEHA Employer Thresholds
- Harassment claims: 5 or more employees (includes harassment by non-employees like customers/vendors)
- Discrimination claims: 5 or more employees
- CFRA leave: 5 or more employees (as of 2021)
- Pregnancy disability leave: 5 or more employees
- Religious accommodation: 5 or more employees
Note: Unlike federal law (15+ employees for Title VII), California's FEHA covers much smaller employers. Individual supervisors can be personally liable for harassment.
Required Investigation Protocol
🔎 Employer's Duty to Investigate
Under FEHA, employers have an affirmative duty to investigate complaints of harassment and discrimination. Failure to properly investigate can itself create liability.
- Receive complaint: Accept complaints through any channel (verbal, written, formal, informal). Don't require specific format.
- Immediate interim measures: Consider separating complainant from alleged harasser if needed. Do not retaliate against complainant.
- Select investigator: Use trained, neutral investigator (internal HR, outside investigator, or attorney).
- Interview complainant: Get detailed account - who, what, when, where, witnesses. Explain confidentiality limits.
- Interview accused: Provide fair opportunity to respond. Don't prejudge outcome.
- Interview witnesses: Talk to anyone with relevant information. Document thoroughly.
- Gather documents: Collect emails, texts, personnel files, performance reviews, policies.
- Make determination: Assess credibility, reach conclusion on whether policy was violated.
- Take corrective action: If violation found, take prompt remedial action proportional to offense.
- Document everything: Written investigation report. Communicate outcome to parties.
💡 The Faragher-Ellerth Defense
For supervisor harassment that doesn't result in tangible employment action, employers may assert an affirmative defense by showing: (1) they exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct harassment (policies, training, complaint procedures), AND (2) the employee unreasonably failed to use available preventive/corrective opportunities. This defense is NOT available if tangible employment action occurred (termination, demotion, etc.).
Available Defenses
Prompt Investigation & Remedial Action Strong
Employer conducted thorough, good-faith investigation upon learning of complaint and took appropriate corrective action. This can limit liability even if harassment occurred.
Evidence needed: Investigation file, interview notes, timeline showing prompt response, documentation of corrective action taken
No Harassment/Discrimination Occurred Strong
Investigation found allegations not substantiated. Conduct didn't rise to level of harassment (isolated minor incidents), or employment decision was based on legitimate non-discriminatory reasons.
Evidence needed: Investigation report, witness statements, contemporaneous documentation supporting legitimate reasons
Legitimate Non-Discriminatory Reason Strong
Adverse employment action was based on legitimate business reasons (poor performance, misconduct, layoff criteria) unrelated to protected characteristic.
Evidence needed: Performance reviews, documented warnings, business justification, evidence same treatment of similarly-situated employees outside protected class
Avoidable Consequences (Faragher-Ellerth) Moderate
For supervisor harassment without tangible job action: Employer had effective anti-harassment policy and complaint procedure, and employee unreasonably failed to use it.
Evidence needed: Written policies distributed to employees, training records, accessible complaint procedures, evidence employee didn't report
Harassment Was Not Severe or Pervasive Moderate
Conduct, while inappropriate, was not severe or pervasive enough to create hostile work environment under legal standard. Isolated incidents, offhand comments, or simple teasing may not meet threshold.
Evidence needed: Context showing limited nature of conduct, lack of impact on work environment, comparisons to case law standards
Statute of Limitations / Administrative Exhaustion Situational
Claim is time-barred (3 years to file with CRD, then 1 year to file suit after right-to-sue) or employee failed to exhaust administrative remedies.
Evidence needed: Timeline of alleged conduct vs. CRD filing date, absence of timely administrative charge
Complainant Not in Protected Class Situational
Complainant cannot establish membership in protected class, or adverse action affected employees across multiple classes equally.
Evidence needed: Employment records, evidence of equal treatment across groups
Response Timeline
Immediately Upon Receiving Complaint/Demand
Notify EPLI carrier. Preserve all documents (litigation hold). Do not retaliate or discuss with others. Separate parties if needed to prevent ongoing issues.
Within 48-72 Hours
Begin investigation. Interview complainant. Gather initial documents. Assess need for outside investigator. Document all steps taken.
Within 2-4 Weeks
Complete investigation. Interview all relevant witnesses. Make findings. Take corrective action if warranted. Prepare investigation report.
If CRD/EEOC Charge Filed
Respond to agency within stated deadline (usually 30 days). Position statement prepared with counsel. Continue to preserve documents.
Document Checklist
Evidence to Preserve and Gather
Sample Position Statement (CRD Response)
⚠ Do Not:
- Retaliate against the complainant in any way (this creates separate liability)
- Discuss the complaint with non-essential personnel
- Destroy or alter any documents
- Contact the complainant to discuss settlement without attorney guidance
- Make any admissions without consulting counsel