Denied an accommodation, pushed out after disclosing a disability, or fired after medical restrictions?

The reasonable accommodation framework: ADA, FEHA, and the interactive process

Disability discrimination law sits at the intersection of two major statutes: the federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), codified at 42 U.S.C. section 12101 et seq., and California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), codified at California Government Code section 12940 et seq. FEHA is consistently more protective of California employees, and most California disability cases are brought primarily under FEHA with ADA as a secondary basis.

What counts as a "disability"

The ADA defines disability as a physical or mental impairment that "substantially limits" one or more major life activities. After the 2008 ADA Amendments Act, that standard is interpreted broadly — most genuinely impairing conditions qualify. FEHA goes further: a condition need only "limit" (not "substantially limit") a major life activity. Under California law, this includes conditions in remission, episodic conditions, and impairments that would substantially limit but for mitigating measures.

Common protected disabilities include: chronic medical conditions (diabetes, lupus, MS, Crohn's), mental-health conditions (depression, anxiety, PTSD, bipolar), orthopedic injuries (back, knee, joint impairments), cognitive impairments (TBI, ADHD, dyslexia), and conditions arising from cancer treatment, surgery recovery, or pregnancy-related complications.

The interactive process

Both ADA and FEHA require employers to engage in a "good-faith, interactive process" with employees who request accommodation. The interactive process is a back-and-forth dialogue to identify what accommodation, if any, would allow the employee to perform essential job functions. Under California law, failure to engage in the interactive process is itself a separate violation of FEHA, even if no reasonable accommodation would have been possible.

The interactive process is not a single conversation. It is an ongoing exchange that continues as the employee's condition or work circumstances change. An employer that engages once, then ignores follow-up communications, has not satisfied the obligation. An employer that tells the employee "we will get back to you" and never does has not satisfied the obligation.

What "reasonable accommodation" actually looks like

Reasonable accommodations include any modification of the workplace, schedule, equipment, or job duties that enables the employee to perform essential functions. Examples:

• Schedule modifications — flexible start/end times, telework, reduced hours, intermittent leave
• Physical modifications — ergonomic equipment, accessible parking, modified workstation
• Job restructuring — reallocating non-essential functions, modifying how essential functions are performed
• Extended leave — leave beyond FMLA/CFRA when leave itself is the accommodation
• Reassignment — to a vacant position the employee is qualified to perform
• Assistive technology — software, equipment, services that enable performance

The accommodation must be "reasonable" — meaning effective in enabling the employee to perform essential functions — and must not impose "undue hardship" on the employer.

The undue hardship defense

An employer can refuse an accommodation if it would impose "undue hardship" — significant difficulty or expense. The burden is on the employer to prove undue hardship, and California courts construe the defense narrowly. Cost alone is not automatically undue hardship; size of the operation, available resources, available alternatives, and actual operational impact are relevant factors. Undue hardship is fact-specific. A stronger employee-side record usually shows that the employer rejected the accommodation without individualized analysis, cost evidence, operational evidence, or consideration of alternatives.

"Essential functions" — the leverage point

An employer's duty to accommodate runs only to "essential functions" of the job. Functions that are marginal or could be reallocated are not essential and cannot defeat an accommodation request. The employer's job description, actual time spent on the function, frequency of the function, and whether the function could be performed by other employees are all relevant. Job descriptions that overstate essential functions are common; the case-evaluation memo looks at actual job performance versus the written description.

Constructive demotion and constructive discharge

Even employees who are not formally terminated can have FEHA disability claims based on constructive demotion (a material reduction in responsibilities or pay) or constructive discharge (working conditions made so intolerable that any reasonable person would resign). Both doctrines apply when the employer's conduct after disability disclosure makes continued employment effectively impossible.

Damages framework

• Back pay and front pay — same as wrongful termination cases
• Emotional distress damages — uncapped under FEHA; capped under ADA at $300K depending on employer size
• Reinstatement — available where appropriate
• Punitive damages — available under FEHA for malice or oppression
• Attorney fees — recoverable by prevailing employee

Six failure-to-accommodate scenarios that often create leverage

Scenario 1: "We'll consider your request" — and never get back to you

Indefinite stalling on an accommodation request is failure to engage in the interactive process. The case is built on the timeline of the request and the absence of substantive response.

Scenario 2: Employer offers an accommodation you didn't ask for and that doesn't actually accommodate

The interactive process requires the employer to consider the employee's preferred accommodation, not just whatever the employer prefers. An ineffective accommodation that the employer chose unilaterally is not a defense.

Scenario 3: Doctor's note disclosed; performance reviews suddenly turn negative

Pretext fact pattern. Performance reviews must be compared before and after the disability disclosure. A sudden shift creates a strong inference of discriminatory motive.

Scenario 4: Employer claims "essential function" you can't perform — but it's not actually essential

Many disability denials hinge on the employer's characterization of an essential function. Actual time-tracking data, job postings, and the experience of similarly situated employees often show the function is marginal or has been reallocated to others.

Scenario 5: Termination after extended leave is the accommodation

FEHA recognizes that extended leave can itself be a reasonable accommodation. Termination because the employee needed more leave than the employer wanted to provide is failure to accommodate, not termination for excessive absences.

Scenario 6: Employer offers reassignment to a position you're overqualified for or underpaid in

The reassignment accommodation must be to a position the employee is qualified to perform — but it must also be a vacant position and should be reasonable in light of the employee's skills and experience. A bad-faith reassignment offer (to a position no one would accept) is not a real accommodation.

First 30 days: disability accommodation action checklist

1. Preserve all accommodation-related communications. Original request, employer responses, doctor's notes, follow-ups. Forward to personal email.
2. Document the interactive process timeline. Each communication, each meeting, each email — date, content, participants.
3. Get a current doctor's note. Detailed restrictions and recommended accommodations. The clearer the medical documentation, the harder it is for the employer to claim "we didn't understand."
4. Request your personnel file. Look for documentation of the request, any internal HR analysis, and post-disclosure performance reviews.
5. Calendar deadlines. EEOC 300 days; CRD/FEHA 3 years for FEHA disability claims.
6. Apply for unemployment if terminated. Disability-related terminations are typically not "for cause."
7. Order the case-evaluation memo. $349, 5 business days. The memo identifies which of the failure-to-accommodate or interactive-process violations apply and the recovery range.